Career History
Education
| 1954-1961 |
Southern Grammar School, Portsmouth |
| 1961-1964 |
Imperial College, London University (Theoretical Physics
Degree) |
| 1970-1973 |
Imperial College, London University (Electrical
Engineering Ph.D.) |
Career in Defence
| 1964-1967 |
Joined Royal Naval Scientific Service at Admiralty Surface Weapons
Establishment to work on electronically scanned antennas for ships |
| 1967-1970 |
Exchange scientist at the US Naval Electronics Laboratory in San
Diego working on theoretical studies of cylindrical electronically scanned antennas |
| 1970-1972 |
Returned to UK to continue work on antennas for ships |
| 1972-1980 |
Moved to work on the use of computer systems for the automation and
support of naval command and control functions |
| 1980-1988 |
Moved to Royal Radar Establishment, Malvern to
lead defence research on computer applications |
| 1988-1994 |
Moved to the Ministry of Defence, London as Director of Strategic
Electronic Communications with systems acquisition responsibility for satellite,
telecommunications and cryptographic systems |
| 1994-1995 |
Became Director of Communications and Information Systems
Engineering with responsibility for improving the performance of MOD in computer systems
acquisition |
| 1995-1996 |
Moved to become Deputy Director of the SHAPE Technical Centre within
NATO (The Hague) |
Career Themes
Microwave Antenna Systems for Ships
I spent the first phase of my
career researching electronically scanned antenna systems for ships. I was
involved in mostly theoretical work on the design of such systems, building computer
models of both antennas and the associated microwave feed systems.
During this period I spent two years working at the US Naval Electronics Laboratory
Center in San Diego building theoretical models of cylindrical antennas and feed
systems for mast mounting on ships.
On return to the UK I took up a related theme of designing antennas for ships with very
low side-lobes in order to avoid detection. This work formed the basis for my Ph.D. thesis
at Imperial College.
Most of this antenna related research involved the use of computer models and during
this period I worked on a wide range of early machines including the Ferranti Pegasus, the
English Electric KDF9 and the CDC 6600. It was during this work that my interest in
computer technology and software design was aroused.
Computer Applications -
Security and Safety
In 1972 I moved to take up R&D in the defence use of computers in real time command
and control applications. Major research issues in this work included design approaches
for software and hardware capable of meeting stringent safety and security
requirements.
Although still working for
the Navy, I also became heavily involved in the use of computer systems for the real-time
control of aircraft and missile systems including Rapier, the Ground to Air system then
being designed for the Army.
In 1980 I moved to the Royal Radar Establishment in Malvern to continue the computer
applications theme with a major interest in the security and safety issues posed by the
automation of defence activities across all three services.
During this period I managed research in the design and development of
real-time operating systems, computer based analysis of critical software, security
protocol design and implementation, general and special purpose computer language design
and the design and development of special microprocessors providing high assurance of
correct operation. The work at Malvern on computer security represented the earliest UK
government sponsored R&D in this field, predating that at GCHQ by more than a decade.
Systems
Acquisition
In 1988 I moved to the
Ministry of Defence in London to manage the acquisition of strategic communications
systems for defence, including transmission and switching systems, cryptographic equipment
and space based systems.
An important part of the work involved the implementation of satellite communications
systems including five successful launches of UK and NATO satellites using facilities in
Florida for Titan and Delta launches and in French Guyana for Ariane (the picture on the right
is courtesy of CSG Kourou).
In 1994 I moved to a new position as Director of Communications and Information Systems
Engineering with responsibility for overcoming the problems which the Ministry of Defence
was then having in the effective acquisition of large computer based systems involving
extensive amounts of software.
This work was not easy, primarily because it proved impossible to convince others
within MOD of the substantial changes in attitude and approach which would be needed to
successfully implement such systems.
Interoperability in NATO
 Since the mid-1980s I
was active within NATO
in pressing forward with technical efforts to improve the effectiveness of
defence computer based systems. This work involved efforts to persuade NATO
countries to adopt common standards within their respective computer
based command and control systems; it also involved efforts to move towards the more
extensive use of commercial products and standards.
I spent the last eighteen months of my defence career as the Deputy Director of the SHAPE Technical Centre in The Hague. This
appointment was cut short by a reorganisation in which the Centre was incorporated into
the NATO C3 Agency in July 1996.
Information Security and Cryptography
By the mid 1980s it was clear that the cost effectiveness of defence computer based
information systems would increasingly depend on the exploitation of products intended
primarily for the civil market. It was also evident that inappropriate MOD
acquisition practices and ineffective GCHQ policies on information security were having a
disastrous
impact on the cost, the affordability and the performance of such systems.
In the 1970s powerful new cryptographic techniques had been discovered
(we now know that they had been previously discovered and kept secret by GCHQ) but they
required large amounts of computer power for their implementation. By the late 1980s,
however, high performance, low cost computer systems made these methods both practical and
highly attractive. Cryptography implemented in software had arrived together
with new algorithms that were especially well suited for use within network based information systems where they
offered the potential to achieve affordable information security both within
defence and more widely.
There were thus good prospects for major improvements in systems performance, and for
reductions in cost, provided only that these new approaches could be rapidly introduced
into the commercial products and systems from which future defence information systems would
be built. At the same time the growing commercial interest in the security of network based
information systems provided an environment which would promote the convergence of defence
and civil interests in this field.
 As a result of these developments I
initiated a Security in Open Systems Technology
Demonstration Programme with the objective of promoting the convergence of defence and
commercial interests in the exploitation of cryptographic security solutions suitable for
use in open systems environments such as the Internet.
I also co-operated with Steve Walker in the United States in the development of the
International Cryptography
Experiment, an informal alliance of groups across government and
industry interested in finding an acceptable way of implementing internationally
interoperable cryptographic security solutions.
My Differences with GCHQ
Prior to 1996 the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)
was opposed to much of my work in the information security field because this
was intended to encourage
the spread of cryptographic information protection outside of government. This
is a theme I pursued while working in MOD in order to achieve affordable defence
information systems and it is one I have continued to pursue since leaving MOD
because of the need to protect the information (and the information systems) on
which all of society now increasingly depends.
GCHQ have opposed such developments
in the past because of the impact that they might have on
their ability to collect electronic intelligence. They maintained this stance
well into the 1990's, with no
evidence of any serious concern for its detrimental impact on other government departments or for its
impact on UK taxpayers. Historically they have also opposed any effective
scrutiny of this policy
other than in committees where the representation has been carefully arranged to ensure that
the policy would never be seriously challenged.
From 1988 until 1996, while working in MOD, I pressed for this
policy to be changed. Moreover, since the early 1990s I also sought changes in the
related US
government policy because of the importance of US based companies in global IT markets
and the resulting need for them to be able to offer the secure products on which
cyberspace safety and security and electronic commerce increasingly depend.
While I was in MOD in the early 1990's GCHQ made several attempts to
undermine my position as a Director for secure systems acquisition. In the US the authorities were more
constructive and were prepared to discuss my concerns. My thanks go to them for
this.
In pursuing these efforts I have been pleased to find that many people within
government were (and are) concerned about the impact of outdated GCHQ policies
on their departments and on UK taxpayers. Within MOD I was pleased to have the support of
a number of senior colleagues who shared my unease about the undemocratic
and unethical way in which these policies were being sustained by preventing effective
debate, even within government, about their true value and their full consequences.
Back to Brian Gladman's Home Page
|